The Role of Khātam al-Anbiyā Construction Headquarters in Developing the Country’s Energy Infrastructure and Its Impact on the Good Governance of the Islamic Republic of Iran

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD Candidate in Public Policy, Islamic Azad University, South Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, Islamic Azad University, South Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran

10.30471/rsm.2026.11661.1539

Abstract

Extended Abstract
 
Introduction and Objectives: Good governance (ḥukmrānī-yi khūwb) is a concept originated by the World Bank, later formulated as a model for governance. It is characterized by indicators such as rule of law (qānūnmindī), promotion of values (irtaqā-yi arzishhā), capacity building (ẓarfiyyatsāzī), accountability (pāsukhgūʾī), poverty reduction (kāhish-i faqr), participation (mushārakat), efficiency (kārāʾī), and effectiveness (aṡarbakhshī), and assists institutions, organizations, and governments in achieving worthy and appropriate performance. In good governance, the government is not the sole active player; rather, the private sector and civil society, which include non-governmental organizations and institutions, play an influential role in political, economic, and social developments.
Given the status and importance of good governance in the development and progress of societies, it is evident that governments, states, and institutions seek to implement this model and realize its indicators. Khatam al-Anbiya Construction Headquarters (Qarārgāh-i Sāzandigī-yi Khātam al-Anbiyā), as an institution and economic arm of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), was established in 1989 (1368 H.sh.) by the order of the Supreme Leader, with its main objective being to strengthen the good governance of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Since its inception, this economic institution has actively participated in the execution and completion of projects in the fields of oil and gas, road and urban development, water and power, etc. Evaluating its performance is of great importance, as it allows for the assessment of both the Headquarters’ functioning in executing these projects and its role as an institution within the good governance of the Islamic Republic of Iran.
Method: The research method is a mixed quantitative-qualitative approach (rawish-i talfīq-i kamī wa kayfī), utilizing questionnaires, library, and internet sources for data collection. In the case study, the Persian Gulf Star Refinery (Pālāyishgāh-i Sitārih-ʾi Khalīj-i Fārs) was selected, and its efficiency and effectiveness were analyzed.
Good Governance Questionnaire: For the research, a good governance questionnaire was developed, focusing on seven indicators: efficiency, effectiveness, transparency (shaffāfiyat), promotion of values, rule of law, accountability, and capacity building. Questions related to these components were formulated and arranged with minor modifications.
Statistical population and sample: From among the energy experts (oil, gas, and petrochemicals) of Khatam al-Anbiya Construction Headquarters as the statistical population, 20 individuals were randomly selected as the sample size and participated in the study.
Data analysis: Subsequently, the questionnaires were statistically analyzed using SPSS software. Using the software data, both questions related to efficiency and effectiveness were analyzed and verified by the authors. Finally, based on the data related to the two mentioned components, the main research question and hypothesis were tested.
Questionnaire specifications: The good governance questionnaire consists of 42 items designed for the seven components of efficiency, effectiveness, promotion of values, capacity building, transparency, accountability, and rule of law. This questionnaire falls into the category of closed, structured, and quantitative questionnaires. The reliability (pāyāyī) of the good governance questionnaire was obtained through Cronbach’s alpha above 0.70, and content validity (rūyī-yi muḥtawāyī) was used to assess the questionnaire’s validity.
Results Analysis of the questionnaire data revealed that Khatam al-Anbiya Construction Headquarters received scores above 4 in all seven good governance indicators. Furthermore, the mean score for the role of Khatam al-Anbiya Construction Headquarters in developing the country’s energy infrastructure and good governance was 4.44, which at the significance level of 0.05 and with 19 degrees of freedom is higher than the hypothetical population mean (3), and t = 18.006 is higher than the critical t-value. Therefore, the Headquarters has performed very desirably in the indicators of efficiency, effectiveness, promotion of values, capacity building, transparency, accountability, and rule of law in the fields of oil and gas, road and urban development, and water and power.
Additionally, the Headquarters’ performance in constructing and completing the Persian Gulf Star Refinery indicates that the progress of this project over 6 years was 37%. With the intensification of sanctions and the withdrawal of foreign contractors, the Ministry of Petroleum entrusted the continuation of the project to Khatam al-Anbiya Headquarters, and the Headquarters succeeded in completing the project within 5 years. Currently, the Persian Gulf Star Refinery, with the production of over 50 million liters of gasoline, supplying strategic energy products, increasing daily gas condensate feedstock receipt by 120,000 barrels (from 360,000 to 480,000 barrels), achieving self-sufficiency and exporting gasoline, reducing environmental pollutants, supplying feedstock for the country’s petrochemical plants, and producing liquid petroleum and gas oil, plays a significant role in the development of the oil, gas, and petrochemical industry. This demonstrates the efficiency and effectiveness of a project built by Khatam al-Anbiya Construction Headquarters.
Discussion and Conclusion: The research data clearly indicates that Khatam al-Anbiya Construction Headquarters executes projects with lower costs compared to domestic and foreign competitors in the two dimensions of efficiency and effectiveness, utilizing domestic technology and resources to complete projects. The outcomes of the Headquarters’ performance in constructing and completing projects in the fields of oil and gas, road and urban development, water and power, etc., clearly speak of development, prosperity, deprivation alleviation (rafʿ-i maḥrūmiyyat), progress, self-sufficiency, exports, and strengthening the country’s infrastructure.

Capacity building: By creating employment and utilizing specialized and elite forces, the Headquarters has strengthened the capacity-building component.
Transparency: It was found that Khatam al-Anbiya Construction Headquarters, by collecting necessary information, assists the Headquarters’ management in making appropriate decisions. Its performance in tenders and auctions, project execution, and their costs has been transparent, and it is subject to the audit organizations of the IRGC and the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Finance, as well as the National Tax Administration.
Promotion of values: The Construction Headquarters has also performed desirably in promoting values.
Accountability: Khatam al-Anbiya Construction Headquarters has had acceptable performance in realizing the accountability component, as the Headquarters, while having a clear policy for feedback on its performance, annually publishes its goals, plans, and performance, making them available to experts and the public.
Rule of law: Furthermore, the Headquarters adheres to legal frameworks in tenders and auctions and does not benefit from any special privileges or rent-seeking advantages (rānt wa imtiyāz) compared to other companies.

Acknowledgement: The authors express their sincere appreciation to all professors and experts who contributed their insights to this research.
Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest in the conduct of this study.

Keywords


منابع
ادیبی‌نیا، علی. (1402). مرور نظام‌مند رهبری معنوی و بهره‌وری سرمایه انسانی؛ کلید موفقیت و رشد سازمانی. مطالعات دین، معنویت و مدیریت، 10(19)، 143-174.doi:10.30471/rsm.2024.9939.1325
امامی،  محمد و شاکری، حمید. (1394). حکمرانی خوب و قانون اساسی جمهوری اسلامی ایران، پژوهشنامه حقوق تطبیقی، 1(2)، 25-57. doi:10.22080/lps.2015.1704
انرژی پرس (1402). پالایشگاه ستاره خلیج فارس ۳۵ درصد از بنزین ایران را تولید می‌کند. موجود در:
https://energypress.ir/
بهرامی، محمد باقر؛ اکبرزاده، فریدون؛ شهابی، روح الله و جلال‌پور، شیوا. (1399). حاکمیت قانون و پیامدهای حقوقی حکمرانی خوب در ایران. پژوهش‌های سیاسی جهان اسلام، 37، 29-47. 20.1001.1.23222980.1399.10.4.3.0 doi:
تقوایی، علی اکبر، و تاجدار، رسول (1388). درآمدی بر حکمروایی خوب شهری در رویکرد تحلیلی. مدیریت شهری، 7 (23)، 45-58.
جوادی ارجمند، محمد جواد و آقایی، حامد. (1404). تأثیر شاخص‌های حکمرانی خوب بر توسعه علم و فناوری: مطالعه موردی سنگاپور. سیاست، 75، 619-646. doi: 10.22059/jpq.2025.375785.1008175
خانباشی، محمد.؛ زاهدی، شمس.السادات.، و الوانی، سید مهدی. (1390). پاسخگویی؛ بستری برای تقویت اعتماد عمومی. نظم و امنیت انتظامی، 2(4)، 29-54.
زندی، رضا. (1396). ستاره‌ خلیج ‌فارس چطور شروع‌ شد؟ چگونه‌ تمام شد؟، وبگاه شانا، موجود در:
https://www.shana.ir/news/276499/
سرمد، ز.هره؛ بازرگان، عباس و حجازی، الهه. (1393). روش‌های تحقیق در علوم رفتاری. تهران: آگه.
علیمردانی، لیلا. (1398). بررسی سیر تحول مدیریت مبتنی بر ارزش. مجله رویکردهای پژوهشی نوآورانه به مدیریت. دوازدهمین کنفرانس ملی و هشتمین کنفرانس بین‌المللی مدیریت فناوری و نوآوری، 2(14)، 13-23.
فرهادی، محمد و برخورداری، زینب. (1392). ارتباط بین ارزش‌های سازمانی و اخلاق. پژوهش‌های اخلاق، 6(2)، 72-91. ‎ doi:20.1001.1.22287264.1392.6.20.4.3
قاضی‌زاده، سید ضیاء الدین.؛ خسروی، فریدون و لونی، کریم. (1399). شاخص‌های ارزیابی مدیریت دانش در سازمان‌های پروژه‌محور با استفاده از روش کارت امتیازی متوازن (BSC) نمونه پژوهش: معاونت عمران قرارگاه سازندگی خاتم‌‌الانبیاء. مدیریت دانش سازمانی، 8، 5-62. . ‌doi:10.47176/smok.2020.1146
قائد، ابراهیم؛ نیاوند، حسن. و دشت‌بانی، یاور. (1404). اثر شاخص حکمرانی خوب بر ارتقای بهره‌وری انرژی در ایران. اقتصاد دفاع و توسعه پایدار، 37، 149-175. 20.1001.1.30607531.1404.10.37.6.4 doi:
کریمی مله، علی و رهام، احسان. (1401). شاخص‌های حکمرانی خوب جمهوری اسلامی ایران در اجرای برنامه‌های پنج‌ساله توسعه (مطالعه موردی سند هفتم توسعه). پژوهش ملل، 85، 7-26.
مردانی شهر بابک، محمد و کلهری، میلاد.. (1400). مدل چابک‌سازی زنجیره تأمین سازمان‌های پروژه‌محور (مطالعه موردی: قرارگاه سازندگی خاتم‌‌الانبیاء). مدیریت بهره‌وری، 15(4)، 137-158.
مرکز مالمیری، احمد. (1385). حاکمیت قانون، مفاهیم، مبانی و برداشت‌ها. تهران: نشر مرکز پژوهش‌های مجلس شورای اسلامی.
میدری، احمد و خیرخواهان، جعفر. (1383). حکمرانی خوب بنیان توسعه. تهران: مرکز پژوهش‌های مجلس شورای اسلامی.
میرزایی، سید طاها. (1402). نقش حکمرانی خوب و اصلاح ساختاری در پیشرفت ایران. همایش الگوی اسلامی ایرانی پیشرفت: واکاوی مفاهیم و نظریه‌های رایج توسعه و تجارب ایران و جهان به سوی نظریه اسلامی ایرانی پیشرفت، ص 878-854.
نیکوکار، غلامحسین؛ حصیرچی، امیر و عبادی، رفیع. (1396). طراحی الگوی واپایش راهبردی طرح‌های کلان قرارگاه سازندگی خاتم‌الانبیاء. راهبرد دفاعی، 15(4)، 165-194.
واحدی، سعید؛ حاتمی، محمد رضا و موسوی، سیدمحمد. (1402). مدل‌سازی حکمرانی خوب در جمهوری اسلامی. جامعه‌شناسی سیاسی انقلاب اسلامی، 4(2)، 83-105.
هاشمی، سیدمحمد (1384). حقوق بشر و آزادی‌های اساسی. تهران: نشر میزان.
References
Adībī Niyā, ʿA. (1402 H.sh./2023). Murūr-i niẓāmand-i rahbarī-yi maʿnavī wa bihrihvarī-yi sarmāyih-ʾi insānī; kelīd-i mowaffaqiyat wa rushd-i sāzmānī [A systematic review of spiritual leadership and human capital productivity: The key to organizational success and growth]. Muṭāliʿāt-i Dīn, Maʿnaviyyat wa Mudīriyyat, 10(19), 143-174. doi: 10.30471/rsm.2024.9939.1325 [In Persian]
ʿAlīmardānī, L. (1398 H.sh./2019). Barrasī-yi sīr-i taḥawwul-i mudīriyyat-i mubtanī bar arzish [Examining the evolution of value-based management]. Duvāzdahumīn Kunfirāns-i Millī wa Hashtumīn Kunfirāns-i Bayn al-Milalī-yi Mudīriyyat-i Fannāwarī wa Nūāwarī, 2(14), 13-23. Retrieved from https://civilica.com/l/9476/ [In Persian]
Bahrāmī, M. B., Akbarzādih, F., Shahābī, R., & Jalālpūr, Sh. (1399 H.sh./2020). Ḥākimiyyat-i qānūn wa payāmadhā-yi ḥuqūqī-yi ḥukmrānī-yi khwb dar Īrān [Rule of law and the legal consequences of good governance in Iran]. Pizhūhishhā-yi Siyāsī-yi Jahān-i Islām, 37, 29-47. DOR: 20.1001.1.23222980.1399.10.4.3.0 [In Persian]
Caves, R. W. (2005). Encyclopedia of the city. Routledge.
Claussen, C. (2011). Capacity building for governance. Retrieved from https://calgaryunitedway.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/capacity_building_for_governance_a_literature_review.pdf
Dictionary.com. (2011). Effectiveness. Retrieved from http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/effectiveness
Emāmī, M., & Shākerī, H. (1394 H.sh./2015). Ḥukmrānī-yi khwb wa qānūn-i asāsī-yi Jumhūrī-yi Islāmī-yi Īrān [Good governance and the constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran]. Pizhūhishnāmih-ʾi Ḥuqūq-i Taṭbīqī, 1(2), 25-57. doi: 10.22080/lps.2015.1704 [In Persian]
Farhādī, M., & Barkhūrdārī, Z. (1392 H.sh./2013). Irtibāṭ bayn arzishhā-yi sāzmānī wa akhlāq [The relationship between organizational values and ethics]. Pizhūhishhā-yi Akhlāq, 6(2), 72-91. DOR: 20.1001.1.22287264.1392.6.20.4.3 [In Persian]
GovOS. (2024). The importance of transparency in government. Retrieved from https://govos.com/blog/the-importance-of-transparency-in-government/
Hāshimī, S. M. (1384 H.sh./2005). Ḥuqūq-i bashar wa āzādīhā-yi asāsī [Human rights and fundamental freedoms]. Tehran: Nashr-i Mīzān. [In Persian]
iapm. (2025). Efficiency? Effectiveness? What is the difference? Retrieved from https://www.iapm.net/en/blog/efficiency-effectiveness-difference
Inclusiveinfra. (2025). Governance and capacity building. Retrieved from https://inclusiveinfra.gihub.org/action-areas/governance-and-capacity-building
Inirzhī Pirs (1402 H.sh./2023). Pālāyishgāh-i Sitārih-ʾi Khalīj-i Fārs 35 darṣad az binzīn-i Īrān rā tawlīd mīkunad [Persian Gulf Star Refinery produces 35% of Iran’s gasoline]. Retrieved from https://energypress.ir/ [In Persian]
Javādī Arjamand, M. J., & Āqāyī, Ḥ. (1404 H.sh./2025). Taʾthīr-i shākhashā-yi ḥukmrānī-yi khwb bar tawsiʿih-ʾi ʿilm wa fannāwarī: muṭāliʿih-ʾi mawridī-i Singāpūr [The impact of good governance indicators on science and technology development: A case study of Singapore]. Siyāsat, 75, 619-646. doi: 10.22059/jpq.2025.375785.1008175 [In Persian]
Karīmī Mallih, ʿA., & Ruhām, E. (1401 H.sh./2022). Shākhashā-yi ḥukmrānī-yi khwb-i Jumhūrī-yi Islāmī-yi Īrān dar ijrā-yi barnāmihā-yi panjsālih-ʾi tawsiʿih (muṭāliʿih-ʾi mawridī sanad-i haftum-i tawsiʿih) [Good governance indicators of the Islamic Republic of Iran in implementing five-year development plans: Case study of the seventh development plan]. Pizhūhish-i Milal, 85, 7-26. [In Persian]
Karmer, L. (2025). Effectiveness vs. efficiency: What’s the difference? Retrieved from https://www.grammarly.com/blog/commonly-confused-words/effectiveness-vs-efficiency/
Khānbāshī, M., Zāhidī, Sh. al-S., & Alvānī, S. M. (1390 H.sh./2011). Pāsukhgūʾī; bastarī barā-yi taqwiyat-i iʿtimād-i ʿumūmī [Accountability: A platform for strengthening public trust]. Naẓm wa Amniyyat-i Iẓṭirārī, 2(4), 29-54. [In Persian]
Mardānī Shahr Bābak, M., & Kalharī, M. (1400 H.sh./2021). Mudil-i chābaksāzī-yi zanjīrih-ʾi taʾmīn-i sāzmānhā-yi prūzhih-miḥwar (muṭāliʿih-ʾi mawridī: Qarārgāh-i Sāzandigī-yi Khātam al-Anbiyā) [An agility model for the supply chain of project-based organizations: Case study of Khatam al-Anbiya Construction Headquarters]. Mudīriyyat-i Bihrihvarī, 15(4), 137-158. [In Persian]
Markaz-i Mālmīrī, A. (1385 H.sh./2006). Ḥākimiyyat-i qānūn: Mafāhīm, mabānī wa bardāshtihā [Rule of law: Concepts, foundations, and interpretations]. Tehran: Markaz-i Pizhūhishhā-yi Majlis-i Shawrā-yi Islāmī. [In Persian]
Mīdrī, A., & Khayrkhāhān, J. (1383 H.sh./2004). Ḥukmrānī-yi khwb bunyān-i tawsiʿih [Good governance: The foundation of development]. Tehran: Markaz-i Pizhūhishhā-yi Majlis-i Shawrā-yi Islāmī. [In Persian]
Mīrzāyī, S. T. (1402 H.sh./2023). Naqsh-i ḥukmrānī-yi khwb wa iṣlāḥ-i sākhtārī dar pišraft-i Īrān [The role of good governance and structural reform in Iran’s progress]. Humāyish-i Algow-i Islāmī-yi Īrānī-yi Pišraft: Wākāwī-yi mafāhīm wa naẓariyyihā-yi rāyij-i tawsiʿih wa tajārub-i Īrān va jahān bih sū-yi naẓariyyih-ʾi Islāmī-yi Īrānī-yi pišraft, 854-878. [In Persian]
Nīkūkar, Gh., Ḥaṣīrchī, A., & ʿIbādī, R. (1396 H.sh./2017). Ṭarāḥī-yi algow-i wāpāyish-i rāhburdī-yi ṭarḥhā-yi kalān-i Qarārgāh-i Sāzandigī-yi Khātam al-Anbiyā [Designing a strategic control model for mega-projects of Khatam al-Anbiya Construction Headquarters]. Rāhburd-i Difāʿī, 15(4), 165-194. [In Persian]
OHCHR. (2025). About good governance. Retrieved from https://www.ohchr.org/en/good-governance/about-good-governance
Pacific. (n.d.). What is good governance? Retrieved from https://www.pacificp.org/sites/default/files/good-governance.pdf
Patel, P. (2021). Efficacy, effectiveness, and efficiency. National Journal of Community Medicine, 12(02), 33-39.
Qāʾid, I., Nīyāwand, Ḥ., & Dashtbānī, Y. (1404 H.sh./2025). Aṡar-i shākhis-i ḥukmrānī-yi khwb bar irtiqā-yi bihrihvarī-yi inirzhī dar Īrān [The effect of good governance indicators on enhancing energy productivity in Iran]. Iqtiṣād-i Difāʿ wa Tawsiʿih-ʾi Pāydār, 37, 149-175. DOR: 20.1001.1.30607531.1404.10.37.6.4 [In Persian]
Qāżīzādih, S. Ż., Khusrawī, F., & Lūnī, K. (1399 H.sh./2020). Shākhashā-yi arzyābī-yi mudīriyyat-i dānish dar sāzmānhā-yi prūzhih-miḥwar bā istifādih az ravish-i kārt-i imtiyāzī-yi mutavāzin (BSC) namūnih-ʾi pizhūhish: Muʿāwiniyyat-i ʿumrān-i Qarārgāh-i Sāzandigī-yi Khātam al-Anbiyā [Indicators for evaluating knowledge management in project-based organizations using the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) method: Case study of the Construction Deputy of Khatam al-Anbiya Construction Headquarters]. Mudīriyyat-i Dānish-i Sāzmānī, 8, 5-62. doi: 10.47176/smok.2020.1146 [In Persian]
Sarmad, Z., Bāzargān, ʿA., & Ḥijāzī, A. (1393 H.sh./2014). Ravishhā-yi taḥqīq dar ʿulūm-i raftārī [Research methods in behavioral sciences]. Tehran: Āgāh. [In Persian]
Taqvāyī, ʿA. A., & Tājdār, R. (1388 H.sh./2009). Darāmadī bar ḥukmrānī-yi khwb-i shahrī dar rūykard-i taḥlīlī [An introduction to urban good governance in an analytical approach]. Mudīriyyat-i Shahrī, 7(23), 45-58. [In Persian]
UCLG-ASPAC. (2021). Good governance: Definition and characteristics. Retrieved from https://uclg-aspac.org/good-governance-definition-and-characteristics/
Vāḥidī, S., Ḥātamī, M. R., & Mūsawī, S. M. (1402 H.sh./2023). Mudilsāzī-yi ḥukmrānī-yi khwb dar Jumhūrī-yi Islāmī [Modeling good governance in the Islamic Republic]. Jāmiʿah‌shināsī-yi Siyāsī-yi Inqilāb-i Islāmī, 4(2), 83-105. [In Persian]
Weiss, T. G. (2000). Governance, good governance and global governance: Conceptual and actual challenges. Third World Quarterly, 21(5), 795-814.
Zandī, R. (1396 H.sh./2017). Sitārih-ʾi Khalīj-i Fārs chegūneh shurūʿ shud? Chegūneh tamām shud? [How did Persian Gulf Star begin? How did it end?]. Shānā. Retrieved from https://www.shana.ir/news/276499/ [In Persian]