Presentation of the Conceptual Model of the Organization's Strategic Guiding Elements

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Member of the Scientific Faculty of the Research Institute of Islamic Sciences and Culture, Qom.

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Farabi School of Tehran University, Qom, Iran.

10.30471/rsm.2024.10380.1396

Abstract

Introduction and objectives: One of the aspects of ambiguity and lack of clarity of strategic documents of organizations is ambiguity, confusion of meaning or overlaps in the explanation of some guiding elements of the organization included in it, such as vision, existential philosophy, mission, policy, strategy, Goals and etc. which is caused by the lack of accurate understanding of the concept of each of these elements and their relationship with each other. This causes in drafting the strategic document, for example, what is actually policy as strategy, what is actually mission as vision, what is actually strategy as a goal, etc. it is stated that this confusion of meanings and concepts and their connections with each other causes the organization to experience ambiguity and confusion in the implementation and evaluation phase. The purpose of this research is to provide a conceptual model of the strategic elements that guide the organization. Therefore, the main question of this research is, "What is the relationship pattern of the organization's guiding elements with each other?" This question can be divided into two sub-questions, which are:
1-    What are the strategic elements that guide the organization?
2-    How are these elements related to each other?
The purpose of this research is not to present a model or explain a process for management or strategic planning but rather to develop a novel conceptual model that can clarify the conceptual distinction of the mentioned elements and also the communication model between them, the thoughts of scientists, researchers, and strategic managers, to help in the field of planning and compiling strategic documents of organizations.
Method: In terms of the research philosophy, the present research is influenced by interpretivism; in terms of the logic of the research, it is interrogative because it has been deriving a new framework, pattern, theory, model, or concept from a set of data. The orientation of this research is of a fundamental type, which is to create or discover a new pattern. 
The nature of this research is qualitative because it seeks to understand and find the phenomenon and its related meanings. It is library research because it deals with written documents, including books and articles, and receives data from written records. The purpose of this research is to explain why it is looking for the type of communication between the components of the phenomenon. Finally, the strategy of this research is document analysis. To understand the "reliability" of the research, four general criteria for trustworthiness proposed by Lincoln and Guba such as Credibility, Dependability, Confirmability, and Transferability have been used. Finally, to increase the reliability of the results of this research based on the above four criteria, the mentioned model was also presented in the form of a promotional chair and was exposed to the criticism and opinions of experts. Then, by taking advantage of the experts' considerations, the sophistication and richness of the research findings were added.
Findings: In this model, the basis and reason for existence are proposed under the title of existential philosophy, which is the origin of the organization's missions on the one hand, it is considered to provide the background and the main substance of the organization's vision and the other hand. Also, in this model, the identity, principles, and values ​​of the organization determine the identity and personality of the organization in distinction from its peers and the limitations and beliefs of the organization, which are the origin of the organization's approaches and provide the form and structure of the determining elements of the organization. Therefore, it can be said that the vision of the organization means the possible, desirable, and ambitious goal of the organization in terms of material and content based on the existential philosophy of the organization, and in terms of form and framework, it is influenced by the identity, values ​​, and principles of the organization.
In the presented model, the mission means the current special task and the job of the employees of the organization in such a way that if the organization is asked what it is currently doing? The answer will be the mission of the organization. This concept comes from the philosophy of the existence of the organization, which on the one hand is the origin of the organization's activities and on the other hand, is the material cause of the formation of the organization's strategy. In this model, the approach of the organization means the attitude and the perspective of looking at the mission and the way of entering into its implementation, which is both the origin of the formation of the organization's policies and the supplier of the form and structure of the organization's strategy. Finally, the organization's strategy, which means the direction of the organization's movement toward the vision, provides its material cause from the mission, its formal cause from the organization's approach, its ultimate cause from the organization's vision, and its active cause from the organization's competitive advantages.
The organization's missions are broken down in the form of macro activities, and the organization's strategies are also manifested in the form of short-term and medium-term goals of the organization, which are realized in the form of the organization's plans. The organization's approaches are also determined in the form of the organization's policies, which specify the guidelines for the implementation of programs. Therefore, it can be said that the material cause of the organization's plans is the organization's activities; the policies of the organization determine the forms and framework of the implementation of the organization's plans and the purpose of the organization's plans is to realize the organization's strategies.
Discussion and conclusion: The main concern of this research was the differences and ambiguities that existed in the scientific community and strategic management activists around the guiding elements of the organization. These differences included both the definition and differentiation of these elements from each other and the way they relate to each other, which was not discussed in the background and literature on the subject. Therefore, the innovation of this research was to provide a model of the guiding elements of the organization to distinguish them from each other and to find out how they are related to each other. This innovation creates mental coherence for researchers and managers.
Conflict of interest: There is no conflict of interest in writing this article.

Keywords


  1. بیک‌زاد، جعفر، ومهدی تقی‌سلطانی (1401). «برنامه‌ریزی و مدیریت استراتژیک در بخش دولتی». چشم‌انداز حسابداری و مدیریت، 5(70)، 50-
  2. پژوهش‌جهرمی، امین (1396). «تحلیل محتوای بیانیه مأموریت دانشگاه­های برتر ایران و جهان». مجله رهیافت، 66، 89-
  3. حقیقی، محمد؛ قارلقی، ابراهیم؛ میراسدی، سمانه و فاطمه نیک‌بخت (1389). «بررسی رابطه میان ویژگی­های بیانیه مأموریت سازمان و عملکرد سازمانی-موردمطالعه: شرکت­های فعال در صنعت غذایی تهران». پژوهشنامه مدیریت تحول، 2(4)، 166-
  4. دهقانی، مرضیه؛ امین خندقی، مقصود؛ جعفری ثانی، حسین و محسن نوغانی‌دخت بهمنی (1390). «واکاوی الگوی مفهومی در حوزه برنامه درسی: نقدی بر پژوهش‌های انجام‌شده با رویکرد طراحی الگو در برنامه درسی». پژوهش‌نامه مبانی تعلیم و تربیت، 1(1)، 99-
  5. راترمل، فرانکتی (1396). مدیریت استراتژیک. ترجمه حسین نوروزی، داور نظریاردبیلی و فاطمه سبحانیفرد. تهران: فوژان.
  6. رضوانی، حمیدرضا و زین­العابدین اکبرزاده (1389). «تحلیل محتوا و مقایسه کیفیت بیانیه مأموریت شرکت­های صنعتی و خدماتی برتر ایران». چشم‌انداز مدیریت بازرگانی، 1، 95-
  7. شاکری، میثم (1401). «بررسی تحلیلی و ارائه مدل مطلوب بیانیه مأموریت سازمان». مجله مدیریت و حسابداری، 6(84)، 2354-
  8. شاوردی، مرضیه (1397). «معادل گزینی برای کلمات کلیدی خوشه واژه «چارچوب، مدل و ...»». مجله سیاست علم و فناوری، 10(1)، 83-
  9. شفیعی نیک­آبادی، محسن و عطا کرباسی­خیر (1396). «بررسی تطبیقی متن چشم‌انداز و بیانیه مأموریت شرکت‌های برتر و شرکت‌های ایرانی در صنایع غذایی با استفاده از تکنیک متن‌کاوی و خوشه‌بندی». مجله آیندهپژوهی مدیریت، 28(111)، 29-
  10. صادقی فسایی، سهیلا و ایمان عرفان‌منش (1394). «مبانی روش‌شناختی پژوهش اسنادی در علوم اجتماعی, موردمطالعه: تأثیرات مدرن شدن بر خانواده ایرانی». مجله راهبرد فرهنگ، 8(29)، 61-
  11. طباطبایی، امیر؛ پرخیده، حسنی؛ مرتضوی، حامد و محبوبه طباطبایی­چهر (1392). «راهبردهایی برای ارتقاء دقت علمی در تحقیقات کیفی». مجله علوم پزشکی خراسان، 3(5)، 663-
  12. محمدپور، احمد (1388). «ارزیابی کیفیت در تحقیق کیفی: اصول و راهبردهای اعتباریابی و تعمیم­پذیری». مجله علوم اجتماعی، 48، 75-
  13. محمدپور، احمد (1397). روش در روش: درباره ساخت معرفت در علوم انسانی. قم: لوگوس.
  14. محمدی، بیوک (1387). درآمدی بر روش تحقیق کیفی. تهران: پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی.
  15. ناصحی­فر، وحید و جواد پورحسینی (1387). «مطالعه تطبیقی اجزای تدوین بیانیه مأموریت شرکت­های فناوری اطلاعات داخلی و خارجی». دانش مدیریت، 21(80)، 123-
  16. Abell, D. F. (1980). Defining the Business: The Starting Point of Strategic Planning. Englewood Cliffs,

    New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

  17. Ackoff, R.L, (1986). Management in small doses, Wiley, New York, NY.
  18. Alegre, I., Berbegal-Mirabent, J., Guerrero, A., Mas-Machuca, M. (2018). The real mission of the mission statement: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Management & Organization, 24(4), 456-473.
  19. Atril, P., Omran, M., & Pointon, J. (2005). Company mission statements and financial performance, Corporate Ownership & Control, 2(3), 28-35.
  20. Bart, C. K. (1997). Industrial firms and the power of mission, Industrial Marketing Management, 26(4), 371–383.
  21. Bart, C. K., Bontis, N., & Taggar, S. (2001). A model of the impact of mission statements on firm performance. Management Decision, 39(1), 19-35.
  22. Bart, C., & Baetz, M. (1998). The Relationship Between Mission Statements and Firm Performance: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Management Studies, 36(6), 823–853.
  23. Bartkus, B. R., & Glassman, M., & McAfee, R. B. (2004). A comparison of the quality of european, japanese and us

    mission statements: A content analysis. European Management Journal, 22(4), 393-401

  24. Bates, D. L. & Dillard, J. E.(1991). Desired future position- a practical tool for planning, Long Range Planning, 24(3), 9-90.
  25. Campbell, A., & Tawadey, K, (1992). Mission and business philosophy, ButterworthHeinnman, Oxford.
  26. Cochran, D., David, F., & Gibson, C. K. (2008). A Framework For Developing An Effective Mission Statement. Journal of Business Strategies, 25(2), 27–39.
  27. Collins, J. C., & Porras, J. I. (1996). Building Your Company’s Vision, Harvard Business Review, September-October, 131-143
  28. Daniel, A. L.(1992). Strategic planning-the rol of the chief executive. Long Range Planning, 25(2), 10-105.
  29. David, F. (1989). How companies define their mission. Long Range Planning, Vol. 22 nº1. 90-97.
  30. David, F. R. (1984). Towards an integration of strategic management models. Southern Management Association, Proceedings, 195-197.
  31. David, F. R. (2005). Strategic Management, 10th edition. USA: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  32. Desmidt, S. & Prinzie, A, (2008). The impact of mission statements: an empirical analysis from a sense making perspective, Academy of Management Proceedings, 8-6.
  33. Drucker, P. (1974). Management: Tasks, Responsibilities, and Practices, New York: Harper & Row.
  34. Forbes, D. & Seena, S, (2006). The Value of a Mission Statement in an Association of not for profit Hospitals, International journal of health care quality assurance, 19(5), 409-419.
  35. Fred, D, (1996). Strategic management, Macmillan Publishing Company, New York, NY.
  36. Ginter, P.M., Swayne, L.M., and Duncan, W.J, (1998). Strategic management of health ozre organizations, 3rd Edition, Malden, MA: Blackwell Business.
  37. Hirota, S. Katsuyuki, K. Hideaki, M. Hong, P., & Park, Y, (2010). Corporate mission, corporate policies and business outcomes: evidence from Japan, Management decision, 48(7), 8834-8853.
  38. Ireland, R. D. & Hitt, M. A.(1992). Mission statements: importance, challenge and recommendations for development. Business Horizons, 35(3), 34-42.
  39. Klemm, M., Sanderson, S. & Luffman, G.(1991). Mission statements: selling corporate values to employees. Long Range Planning, 24(3), 8-73.
  40. Lynch, R., (2000). Corporate strategy, Fourth edition, Prentice Hall, Engleska
  41. Mason, J. B., & Ezell, H. F.(1993). Marketing Management, Macmillan Publishing Company.
  42. Matejka, K., Kurke, L. B., & Gregory, B. (1993). Mission impossible? Designing a great mission statement to ignite your plans. Management Decision, 31(4), 34-37.
  43. McGinnis, V. (1981). The Mission Statement: A Key Step in Strategic Planning. Business, 31(6), 39-43.
  44. Medley, G. J.(1992). WWF UK creates a new mission. Long Range Planning, 25(2), 8-63.
  45. Mitra, Nayan (2021). Impact of strategic management, corporate social responsibility on firm performance in the post mandate period: evidence from India. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 1-15.
  46. Mullane, J. V. (2002). The mission statement is a strategic tool: When used properly. Managem-ent Decision, 40(5), 448-455.
  47. Nanus, B. (1992). Visionary Leadership: Creating a Compelling Sense of Direction for Your Organization. Jossey-Bass Inc., 350 Sansome Street, San Francisco, CA 94104-1310.
  48. O'Gorman, C., & Doran, R. (1999). Mission statements in small and medium-sized businesses, Journal of Small Business Management, 37(4), 59–66.
  49. Pearce, J. A. (1982). The Company Mission As a Strategic Tool. Sloan Management Review, 23(3), 15-24.
  50. Pearce, J.A., & David, F. (1987). Corporate mission statements: The bottom line, Academy of Management Executive, 1(2), 109–116.
  51. Piercy, N. & Morgon, N. (1994). Mission analysis: An operational approach. Journal of General Management, 19(3), 1-19.
  52. Rajasekar, James (2013). A Comparative Analysis of Mission Statement Content and Readability. Journal of Management Policy and Practice, 14(6), 131-147.
  53. Robbins, S, (2007). Management, 9 Ed, Prentic- Hall.
  54. Ruiz, Patrícia Guix (2017). Impact of mission statement components on social enterprises’ performance. MASTER THESIS. Màster Universitari en Direcció d’Empeses i Sistemes de Producció.
  55. Saunders, M., Lewis, P. & Thornhill, A. (2009). Research Methods for Business Students.5eds , Harlow, Pearson Education.
  56. Schmidt, Eduard & Walle, Steven Van de. )2022(. Defending, prospecting or reacting? Strategic management during cutbacks in the Dutch penitentiary sector. Financial Acc & Man, 38, 77–96.
  57. Sinkovics, R. R. (2008). Enhancing the Trustworthiness of Qualitative Research in International Business, MIR, 48(6), 689-714.
  58. Staples, W. A. & Black, K. V. (1984). Defining our business mission: A strategic perspective. Journal ofBusiness Strategies, 1, 33-39.
  59. Steiner, G. (1979). Strategic Planning: What Every Manager Must Know. New York: The Free Press.
  60. Sufi, T. & Lyons, H, (2003). Mission statement exposed, International journal of contemporary hospitality management, 85 (5), 755-767.
  61. Tanković, Ana Čuić (2013). Defining Strategy using Vision and Mission Statements of Croatian Organizations In Times of Crisis. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 26(1), 331-342.
  62. Total Research, Strategic Marketing Services (1999). UK mission statements, what are they for and how effective are they? Total Research, Brentford.
  63. Twining, J. (2000). A Naturalistic Journey into the Collaboratory: In Search of Understanding for Prospective Participants, Denton, Texas Woman’s University.
  64. Vandijck, D., Desmidt. S., & Buelens M. (2007). Relevance of mission statements in Flemish not-forprofit healthcare organizations. Journal of Nursing Management, 15(2), 131-41.
  65. Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The Corporate Social Performance – Financial Performance Link, Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303-319.
  66. Want, J. H. (1986). Corporate Mission, Management Review, August, 75 (1), 46-50.
  67. Wilson, I. (1992). Realizing the power of strategic vision, Long Range Planning, 25(5), 18-28.