<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Research Institute of Hawzah and University; "Hawzah wa Dāneshgāh Research Institute"</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Studies in Religion, Spirituality &amp; Management</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2981-1171</Issn>
				<Volume>12</Volume>
				<Issue>23</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2025</Year>
					<Month>03</Month>
					<Day>21</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Designing an Administrative Integrity Roadmap at the Organizational Level with an Islamic Management Approach  (Case Study: Yazd Governorate)</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Designing an Administrative Integrity Roadmap at the Organizational Level with an Islamic Management Approach  (Case Study: Yazd Governorate)</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>89</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>109</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">2340</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.30471/rsm.2025.10751.1440</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Hedayat </FirstName>
					<LastName>Kargar-Shouroki</LastName>
<Affiliation>Ph.D. in Management, Yazd Governorate, Yazd, Iran.</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0002-9910-9975</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Kazem </FirstName>
					<LastName>Darand</LastName>
<Affiliation>M.A. in Management, Yazd Governorate, Yazd, Iran.</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0009-0000-8845-993X</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Habib </FirstName>
					<LastName>Salmani</LastName>
<Affiliation>M.A. in Management, Yazd Governorate, Yazd, Iran.</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0009-0000-8845-993X</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mostafa </FirstName>
					<LastName>Etemadian</LastName>
<Affiliation>M.Sc. in Biomedical Engineering, Yazd Governorate, Yazd, Iran.</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0009-0000-8845-993X</Identifier>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2025</Year>
					<Month>02</Month>
					<Day>05</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Introduction and Objectives: Organizational integrity is a cornerstone of Islamic management, yet Iran faces significant challenges in combating corruption, as evidenced by both national reports and international assessments. Despite the critical need for integrity in Iran’s administrative systems, a systematic framework for implementing integrity-enhancing measures—particularly one grounded in Islamic management principles—remains underdeveloped. This study addresses this gap by exploring how organizations can operationalize integrity through a structured roadmap, delineating responsibilities across units and establishing a clear monitoring mechanism.&lt;br /&gt;The primary research question is: &lt;em&gt;How can an organizational integrity roadmap, rooted in Islamic management principles, be designed to clarify responsibilities and ensure measurable progress?&lt;/em&gt; Focusing on Yazd Governorate as a case study, this research aims to develop a practical roadmap to enhance organizational integrity, leveraging roadmapping—a globally recognized planning tool—adapted to the context of corruption prevention and Islamic governance.&lt;br /&gt;Methodology: This applied qualitative study employs a descriptive survey approach, structured in three phases:&lt;br /&gt;1. Data Collection:&lt;br /&gt;* A non-sampled survey of managers across 21 headquarters units and 12 sub-governorates in Yazd Governorate was conducted.&lt;br /&gt;* An open-ended questionnaire, validated by experts, captured proposed measures for improving organizational integrity.&lt;br /&gt;2. Data Analysis:&lt;br /&gt;* Seven specialists participated in an expert panel to analyze responses and draft the roadmap using structured group discussions.&lt;br /&gt;3. Validation:&lt;br /&gt;* Stakeholder feedback was obtained through:&lt;br /&gt;- A formal meeting of the &lt;em&gt;Yazd Governorate’s Organizational Integrity Improvement Working Group&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;- Written evaluations from two key entities: the &lt;em&gt;Ministry of Interior’s Inspection and Performance Management Center&lt;/em&gt; and the &lt;em&gt;Yazd Provincial Management and Planning Organization&lt;/em&gt;, both of which endorsed the final roadmap.&lt;br /&gt;Results: The study identified 14 core activities for promoting integrity, categorized into functional, institutional, and temporal mappings:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;No.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Functional Mapping&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Institutional Mapping&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Time Mapping&lt;br /&gt;(Actions during years one to five)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Electronic service delivery&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Information Technology&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Needs assessment; Infrastructure provision; Systems deployment; Integration&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;2&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Employee training&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Planning&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Needs assessment; Conducting courses; Effectiveness analysis; Feedback gathering&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;3&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Strengthening infrastructure&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Information Technology&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Needs assessment; Financing; Deployment; Maintenance; Updating&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;4&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Transparency&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Public Relations&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Needs assessment; Infrastructure provision; Information provision; Feedback gathering&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;5&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Strengthening supervision&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Performance Management /Security&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Needs assessment; Legal infrastructure provision; Implementing new regulations; Feedback gathering for reform&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;6&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Resolving conflicts of interest&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;7&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Public awareness&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Public Relations&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Needs assessment; Information provision; Effectiveness analysis; Feedback gathering&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;8&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Reforming regulations&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Performance Management&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Needs assessment; Providing a justification report; Following up on receiving results&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;9&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Participation&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Planning&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Needs assessment; Legal infrastructure provision; Implementing new regulations; Feedback gathering for reform&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;10&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Strengthening accountability&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Performance Management&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;11&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Accepting service delivery&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Planning&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Analysis; Preparation; Explanation and encouragement; Conducting insight-enhancing courses; Implementing positive role model mechanisms&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;12&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Strengthening spirituality&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Planning&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;13&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Reforming compensation for services&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Administrative and Financial&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Needs assessment; Developing a code of conduct; Implementing a code of conduct; Effectiveness analysis and feedback gathering for reforming the mechanism&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;14&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Establishing knowledge management&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Planning&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Key institutional actors include IT, Planning, Performance Management, and Public Relations units. The roadmap allocates responsibilities and timelines, ensuring accountability and measurable progress.&lt;br /&gt;Discussion and Conclusions: This study aligns with prior research emphasizing awareness, training, technological advancement, and participatory governance. Notably, it resonates with Iran’s &lt;em&gt;Thirteenth Government Anti-Corruption Document&lt;/em&gt; in advocating transparency, conflict-of-interest management, and cultural reform. However, it introduces novel elements—spirituality reinforcement, service acceptance, and knowledge management—distinguishing it from secular frameworks. These unique dimensions stem from:&lt;br /&gt;1. The Islamic management approach, which prioritizes moral and spiritual development.&lt;br /&gt;2. Context-specific gaps, such as Yazd Governorate’s lack of knowledge management systems.&lt;br /&gt;The proposed roadmap offers a replicable model for public-sector organizations seeking to institutionalize integrity through structured, faith-aligned strategies.&lt;br /&gt;Acknowledgements: The authors extend gratitude to the managers and staff of Yazd Governorate for their contributions.&lt;br /&gt;Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Introduction and Objectives: Organizational integrity is a cornerstone of Islamic management, yet Iran faces significant challenges in combating corruption, as evidenced by both national reports and international assessments. Despite the critical need for integrity in Iran’s administrative systems, a systematic framework for implementing integrity-enhancing measures—particularly one grounded in Islamic management principles—remains underdeveloped. This study addresses this gap by exploring how organizations can operationalize integrity through a structured roadmap, delineating responsibilities across units and establishing a clear monitoring mechanism.&lt;br /&gt;The primary research question is: &lt;em&gt;How can an organizational integrity roadmap, rooted in Islamic management principles, be designed to clarify responsibilities and ensure measurable progress?&lt;/em&gt; Focusing on Yazd Governorate as a case study, this research aims to develop a practical roadmap to enhance organizational integrity, leveraging roadmapping—a globally recognized planning tool—adapted to the context of corruption prevention and Islamic governance.&lt;br /&gt;Methodology: This applied qualitative study employs a descriptive survey approach, structured in three phases:&lt;br /&gt;1. Data Collection:&lt;br /&gt;* A non-sampled survey of managers across 21 headquarters units and 12 sub-governorates in Yazd Governorate was conducted.&lt;br /&gt;* An open-ended questionnaire, validated by experts, captured proposed measures for improving organizational integrity.&lt;br /&gt;2. Data Analysis:&lt;br /&gt;* Seven specialists participated in an expert panel to analyze responses and draft the roadmap using structured group discussions.&lt;br /&gt;3. Validation:&lt;br /&gt;* Stakeholder feedback was obtained through:&lt;br /&gt;- A formal meeting of the &lt;em&gt;Yazd Governorate’s Organizational Integrity Improvement Working Group&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;- Written evaluations from two key entities: the &lt;em&gt;Ministry of Interior’s Inspection and Performance Management Center&lt;/em&gt; and the &lt;em&gt;Yazd Provincial Management and Planning Organization&lt;/em&gt;, both of which endorsed the final roadmap.&lt;br /&gt;Results: The study identified 14 core activities for promoting integrity, categorized into functional, institutional, and temporal mappings:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;No.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Functional Mapping&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Institutional Mapping&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Time Mapping&lt;br /&gt;(Actions during years one to five)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Electronic service delivery&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Information Technology&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Needs assessment; Infrastructure provision; Systems deployment; Integration&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;2&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Employee training&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Planning&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Needs assessment; Conducting courses; Effectiveness analysis; Feedback gathering&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;3&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Strengthening infrastructure&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Information Technology&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Needs assessment; Financing; Deployment; Maintenance; Updating&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;4&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Transparency&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Public Relations&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Needs assessment; Infrastructure provision; Information provision; Feedback gathering&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;5&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Strengthening supervision&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Performance Management /Security&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Needs assessment; Legal infrastructure provision; Implementing new regulations; Feedback gathering for reform&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;6&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Resolving conflicts of interest&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;7&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Public awareness&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Public Relations&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Needs assessment; Information provision; Effectiveness analysis; Feedback gathering&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;8&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Reforming regulations&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Performance Management&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Needs assessment; Providing a justification report; Following up on receiving results&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;9&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Participation&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Planning&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Needs assessment; Legal infrastructure provision; Implementing new regulations; Feedback gathering for reform&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;10&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Strengthening accountability&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Performance Management&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;11&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Accepting service delivery&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Planning&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Analysis; Preparation; Explanation and encouragement; Conducting insight-enhancing courses; Implementing positive role model mechanisms&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;12&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Strengthening spirituality&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Planning&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;13&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Reforming compensation for services&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Administrative and Financial&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Needs assessment; Developing a code of conduct; Implementing a code of conduct; Effectiveness analysis and feedback gathering for reforming the mechanism&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;14&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Establishing knowledge management&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Planning&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Key institutional actors include IT, Planning, Performance Management, and Public Relations units. The roadmap allocates responsibilities and timelines, ensuring accountability and measurable progress.&lt;br /&gt;Discussion and Conclusions: This study aligns with prior research emphasizing awareness, training, technological advancement, and participatory governance. Notably, it resonates with Iran’s &lt;em&gt;Thirteenth Government Anti-Corruption Document&lt;/em&gt; in advocating transparency, conflict-of-interest management, and cultural reform. However, it introduces novel elements—spirituality reinforcement, service acceptance, and knowledge management—distinguishing it from secular frameworks. These unique dimensions stem from:&lt;br /&gt;1. The Islamic management approach, which prioritizes moral and spiritual development.&lt;br /&gt;2. Context-specific gaps, such as Yazd Governorate’s lack of knowledge management systems.&lt;br /&gt;The proposed roadmap offers a replicable model for public-sector organizations seeking to institutionalize integrity through structured, faith-aligned strategies.&lt;br /&gt;Acknowledgements: The authors extend gratitude to the managers and staff of Yazd Governorate for their contributions.&lt;br /&gt;Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Organizational Integrity</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Islamic Management</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Functional Mapping</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Institutional Mapping</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Time Mapping</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Roadmap Design</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://rsm.rihu.ac.ir/article_2340_141a4e55caf4e4ce1ea16f5a48303dcc.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
